EU sues UK over move to rewrite post-Brexit trade rules

June 15, 2022 GMT
1 of 4
European Commissioner for Inter-institutional Relations and Foresight Maros Sefcovic holds up documents as he speaks during a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Wednesday, June 15, 2022. Britain's government on Monday proposed new legislation that would unilaterally rewrite post-Brexit trade rules for Northern Ireland, despite opposition from some U.K. lawmakers and EU officials who say the move violates international law. (AP Photo/Geert Vanden Wijngaert)
1 of 4
European Commissioner for Inter-institutional Relations and Foresight Maros Sefcovic holds up documents as he speaks during a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Wednesday, June 15, 2022. Britain's government on Monday proposed new legislation that would unilaterally rewrite post-Brexit trade rules for Northern Ireland, despite opposition from some U.K. lawmakers and EU officials who say the move violates international law. (AP Photo/Geert Vanden Wijngaert)

BRUSSELS (AP) — The European Union sued Britain on Wednesday over its move to rewrite the trade rules agreed to when the country left the EU two years ago, ratcheting up tensions between the major economic partners.

Earlier this week, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government proposed legislation that would remove customs checks on some goods entering Northern Ireland from the rest of the U.K. Those checks were imposed as part of a hard-fought compromise when Britain left the EU and its borderless free-trade zone — but have caused both economic and political problems in Northern Ireland, where some say they undermine the region’s place in the United Kingdom.

The EU has decried Britain’s effort to rip up part of the deal.

“Let’s call a spade a spade: This is illegal,” European Commission Vice President Maroš Šefčovič told a news conference in Brussels on Wednesday.

The EU’s decision to pursue legal action raises the possibility that either or both sides could impose punishing tariffs on the other. Šefčovič refused to rule out such a move Wednesday. But the prospect of trade war still seemed a distant possibility since both would suffer and have said they want to find a solution outside of the courts.

According to the latest EU figures, the 27-nation bloc is the U.K.’s biggest trading partner, while the U.K. is the EU’s third-biggest trading after the U.S. and China.

At the heart of the dispute — and the whole reason a compromise was needed in the first place — are concerns about stability in Northern Ireland, which is the only part of the U.K. that shares a border with an EU country, namely Ireland. The checks were imposed in order to keep that border open because that is a key pillar of the peace process that ended decades of violence in Northern Ireland.

But British unionists in Northern Ireland say the new checks have put a burden on businesses and frayed the bonds between the region and the rest of the U.K. The rules have also led to a political crisis in Northern Ireland, where the main unionist party blocked the formation of a new power-sharing government in Belfast, saying it won’t take part until the Brexit trade rules are scrapped.

Šefčovič, the EU commission official, said he’s willing to keep talks going with the U.K. — but insisted solutions should be found within the original agreement, called the Northern Ireland Protocol.

The British government called the EU’s move “disappointing.”

“The U.K.’s preference remains for a negotiated solution but the proposals set out by the EU today are the same proposals we have been discussing for months,” it said.

It added that it had to act because the protocol was undermining Northern Ireland’s peace accord by “disrupting trade and leading to people in Northern Ireland being treated differently to the rest of the U.K.”

While there are serious disagreements between the two sides, the events of this week also reflect maneuvering as each tries to wrangle the best deal from the other.

The legislation the British government proposed will take months to wind its way through Parliament, and officials appear to be hoping they will get a new deal with the EU in the meantime.

That seems unlikely. Officials in the EU and member country governments are incensed at what they see as the U.K.’s intention to break international law. Johnson’s government insists its unilateral move is lawful, but many lawyers and lawmakers — including some in his governing Conservative Party — disagree.

The so-called infringement procedure that the EU renewed Wednesday likewise will take months to unfold. The action was originally launched against the U.K. government last year but was put on hold in as both parties tried to find a solution.

The EU says it reopened the case out of frustration with those talks. The EU Commission added that if the British government does not reply within two months, it will consider taking the U.K. to the European Court of Justice.

“There have been only new and new demands coming from the U.K. government,” Šefčovič said.

The EU also opened two other legal actions that accuse the U.K. of ignoring two other parts of the post-Brexit agreement.

The U.K. government said its proposed measures ease the burden on businesses and customers, including by reducing paperwork for goods coming from Britain into Northern Ireland and that are staying there. Goods continuing on to Ireland or elsewhere in the EU would continue to be checked at Northern Ireland ports.

Šefčovič said the EU would flesh out proposals made previously for facilitating the movement of goods from Britain to Northern Ireland while drastically reducing paperwork. But the EU worries lax border checks are letting smuggled goods enter Ireland, a threat to the bloc’s borderless single market.

___

Lawless reported from London.